Triple
T38599246
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C major |
E934164
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRelativeMinor |
P100463
|
FINISHED |
| Object | A minor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: A minor | Statement: [C major, hasRelativeMinor, A minor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRelativeMinor Context triple: [C major, hasRelativeMinor, A minor]
-
A.
isMinorUpdateComparedTo
Indicates that one item represents only a small or incremental change relative to another item.
-
B.
relativeMinor
chosen
Indicates that one musical key is the relative minor of another, sharing the same key signature but having a different tonic.
-
C.
hasSmallerVersion
Indicates that one entity exists as a reduced-size or smaller-scale version of another entity.
-
D.
isMinorPortRelativeTo
Indicates that one port is considered smaller, less significant, or of lower capacity compared to another port.
-
E.
relativeMajor
Indicates that one musical key is the relative major of another key, sharing the same key signature but having a different tonic.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ecc17688190b389b693a5927501 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c903be48190a2fafa53d7d50d42 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a2026248190b894436a578d79ac |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:32 p.m.