Triple
T38426942
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Riego Pronunciamiento |
E903385
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportedPoliticalCurrent |
P132388
|
FINISHED |
| Object | constitutionalism |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constitutionalism | Statement: [Riego Pronunciamiento, supportedPoliticalCurrent, constitutionalism]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportedPoliticalCurrent Context triple: [Riego Pronunciamiento, supportedPoliticalCurrent, constitutionalism]
-
A.
politicalSupporter
Indicates that one entity supports, endorses, or aligns with the political views, actions, or position of another entity.
-
B.
supportedPoliticalStatus
Indicates that one entity endorsed, favored, or advocated for a particular political status or position of another entity.
-
C.
hasPoliticalCurrent
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with, aligned to, or characterized by a particular political current, ideology, or movement.
-
D.
politicalCurrent
Indicates that an entity is presently holding or engaged in a specific political role, status, or activity at the current time.
-
E.
supportedLegislation
Indicates that an entity endorsed, promoted, or voted in favor of a particular piece of legislation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e67e4fc8190a7d08dfe9a8af998 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c903be48190a2fafa53d7d50d42 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a1e32108190897356d6a7fed879 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.