Triple
T38362351
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jose Rios |
E892326
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOfTouringBandFor |
P182469
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Anderson .Paak |
E34461
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Anderson .Paak | Statement: [Jose Rios, partOfTouringBandFor, Anderson .Paak]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfTouringBandFor Context triple: [Jose Rios, partOfTouringBandFor, Anderson .Paak]
-
A.
playedWithBandFrom
Indicates that an individual has performed as a member or guest with a musical band originating from a specified place or organization.
-
B.
touringBandMember
chosen
Indicates that a person is a member of a band specifically in the context of its touring or live performance lineup.
-
C.
playedInBand
Indicates that an entity was a member of and performed as part of a particular band.
-
D.
partOfBandLineup
Indicates that an entity is a member of, or included in, the lineup of a particular band.
-
E.
hasBandMember
Indicates that a musical group includes a specific individual as one of its members.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e47cb4c8190bdd92cd1db59c0c5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01bdacb52481909c56b0398106640e |
completed | May 11, 2026, 11:29 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a41c279a5488190ae4b04aa12214a86 |
completed | June 29, 2026, 12:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01bd30c8ec8190b1e54d7658b01a8d |
completed | May 11, 2026, 11:27 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:31 p.m.