Triple

T38229058
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Blessed Assurance E1012233 entity
Predicate hasRefrainLine P143828 FINISHED
Object This is my story, this is my song LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: This is my story, this is my song | Statement: [Blessed Assurance, hasRefrainLine, This is my story, this is my song]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRefrainLine
Context triple: [Blessed Assurance, hasRefrainLine, This is my story, this is my song]
  • A. hasRefrainRelatedTo
    Indicates that a refrain (repeated musical or textual section) in one work is thematically or content-wise related to another specified subject or element.
  • B. hasRefrainFunction chosen
    Indicates that something serves the role or function of a refrain, typically recurring in a structured or repetitive way within a larger context.
  • C. refrainCount
    Indicates the number of times a particular refrain or repeated segment occurs within a larger sequence or structure.
  • D. hasRhymeLine
    Indicates that one line of text rhymes with another line.
  • E. containsRefrainAlsoFoundIn
    Indicates that one entity includes a refrain that is also present in another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd25e0c81909f2abd0803e5e3ee completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c903be48190a2fafa53d7d50d42 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a1c850c819088795a7ae59bdeb8 completed May 12, 2026, 7:06 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:30 p.m.