Triple

T37555122
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject House of Constructs E933677 entity
Predicate governsDomainOf P203667 FINISHED
Object constructs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: constructs | Statement: [House of Constructs, governsDomainOf, constructs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governsDomainOf
Context triple: [House of Constructs, governsDomainOf, constructs]
  • A. governedDomainType
    Indicates that one entity establishes rules, control, or authority over a specific type or category of domain.
  • B. domainGoverned
    Indicates that one domain or territory is politically controlled, administered, or ruled by another authority or governing entity.
  • C. regulatoryDomain
    Indicates that one entity defines or governs the rules, policies, or constraints under which another entity must operate.
  • D. governsInRelationTo chosen
    Indicates that one entity exercises authoritative control, direction, or regulatory power over another entity within a specific relational or contextual framework.
  • E. governedFor
    Indicates that one entity exercised governing authority or administrative control on behalf of, or in the interest of, another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eca55bc8190acf25741793d5dac completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0356f541b08190b40469aa628087f4 completed May 12, 2026, 4:36 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a03569e4fa881909c57351a6c489636 completed May 12, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.