Triple
T37440843
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Benjamin Ide Wheeler |
E930414
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Analogy in Language
"Analogy in Language" is a linguistic work by Benjamin Ide Wheeler that examines how patterns of analogy shape the structure, evolution, and usage of language.
|
E2227781
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Analogy in Language | Statement: [Benjamin Ide Wheeler, notableWork, Analogy in Language]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Analogy in Language Triple: [Benjamin Ide Wheeler, notableWork, Analogy in Language]
Generated description
"Analogy in Language" is a linguistic work by Benjamin Ide Wheeler that examines how patterns of analogy shape the structure, evolution, and usage of language.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76ebfdcb8819098562ff3db673b04 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fb8ddb4d24819083020129167e737c |
completed | May 6, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a40825b4cc8819086490ef03d79b13a |
completed | June 28, 2026, 2:09 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a408626402c81909022ea8a43da5178 |
completed | June 28, 2026, 2:25 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a40869086208190a3bc5409cc268462 |
completed | June 28, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:17 p.m.