Triple

T37307824
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Yao’s garbled circuits E926124 entity
Predicate typicalAdversaryModel P127290 FINISHED
Object semi-honest adversary — LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: semi-honest adversary | Statement: [Yao’s garbled circuits, typicalAdversaryModel, semi-honest adversary]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAdversaryModel
Context triple: [Yao’s garbled circuits, typicalAdversaryModel, semi-honest adversary]
  • A. modelsAdversary chosen
    Indicates that one entity represents, simulates, or formally characterizes another entity as an adversary within a given context or system.
  • B. commonAdversary
    Indicates that two or more entities share the same opponent, rival, or threat.
  • C. adversaryView
    Indicates that one entity observes, analyzes, or interprets another entity from the perspective of an opponent or potential attacker.
  • D. primaryAdversaryPlanning
    Indicates that an entity is the main opposing force actively formulating or directing plans against another entity.
  • E. mainAdversaryDescribedAs
    Indicates that the primary opponent or enemy in a conflict is characterized or labeled in a particular way.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eb1bc508190924e9fa5d8acdeb3 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8efcd4819088c2aeead65d93df completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.