Triple
T37278103
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Music in Motion |
E924702
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPrimaryRhythmicFocus |
P203215
|
FINISHED |
| Object | rhythmic innovation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rhythmic innovation | Statement: [Music in Motion, hasPrimaryRhythmicFocus, rhythmic innovation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryRhythmicFocus Context triple: [Music in Motion, hasPrimaryRhythmicFocus, rhythmic innovation]
-
A.
hasRhythmicOrigin
Indicates that something originates from, is derived from, or is fundamentally based on rhythm or rhythmic patterns.
-
B.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
C.
hasRhythmicComplexity
Indicates that one entity exhibits or involves a level of rhythmic intricacy or variation in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
primaryRhythmType
chosen
Indicates the main or dominant rhythmic pattern or category associated with an entity in contrast to any secondary or supporting rhythms.
-
E.
hasRhythmInfluence
Indicates that one entity has influenced or shaped the rhythmic patterns, style, or timing characteristics of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76eacdd8c819094080d3991e6d37c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8efcd4819088c2aeead65d93df |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:16 p.m.