Triple

T37247107
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sabina E923886 entity
Predicate relationshipToGladysAntrobus P205795 FINISHED
Object servant in the same household LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: servant in the same household | Statement: [Sabina, relationshipToGladysAntrobus, servant in the same household]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToGladysAntrobus
Context triple: [Sabina, relationshipToGladysAntrobus, servant in the same household]
  • A. hasRelationshipToGladysGreen
    Indicates that one entity has a specified type of relationship or connection to the entity named Gladys Green.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithGlendaParks
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Glenda Parks.
  • C. relationshipToGeraldArbuthnot
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or interpersonal connection that an entity has to Gerald Arbuthnot.
  • D. relationshipToGeorgeAndMartha
    Indicates the specific familial, social, or other relational connection that an entity has to the pair George and Martha considered together.
  • E. relationshipToBarnabasCollins
    Indicates the type or nature of a subject’s personal or familial connection to Barnabas Collins.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76eaabb4c819093b751b139dad551 completed May 3, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c842b2c819082f1d2db995ac2eb completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.