Triple
T37145320
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | MLC |
E920225
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableLeaderOnTrialAt |
P205759
|
FINISHED |
| Object | International Criminal Court |
E10832
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: International Criminal Court | Statement: [MLC, notableLeaderOnTrialAt, International Criminal Court]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableLeaderOnTrialAt Context triple: [MLC, notableLeaderOnTrialAt, International Criminal Court]
-
A.
notableIndictedLeaders
Indicates that the leaders associated with an entity are notable figures who have been formally indicted on criminal charges.
-
B.
defendantInNotableTrial
Indicates that an entity served as the defendant in a trial that is considered notable or historically significant.
-
C.
notableArrestee
Indicates that the subject is a person who was arrested in a way considered notable or significant, typically in connection with the object (such as an event, case, or authority).
-
D.
notableProsecutor
Indicates that the person served as a prosecutor in a way that is widely recognized as significant or noteworthy.
-
E.
defenseAttorneyInNotableTrial
Indicates that a person served as the defense attorney representing a party in a legally or historically notable trial.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e9f87c08190b4c8f7fafbd8345a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a3f6a2d35848190b6410e4ac53df115 |
completed | June 27, 2026, 6:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a11efc08190bb7cacc1325b4dc6 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c842b2c819082f1d2db995ac2eb |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:15 p.m.