Triple

T36956847
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rad E914209 entity
Predicate hasReplayValue P99850 FINISHED
Object high replayability due to procedural generation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high replayability due to procedural generation | Statement: [Rad, hasReplayValue, high replayability due to procedural generation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasReplayValue
Context triple: [Rad, hasReplayValue, high replayability due to procedural generation]
  • A. hasReplay
    Indicates that an event, action, or interaction is available to be viewed or experienced again in a recorded or reconstructed form.
  • B. hasReplayStage
    Indicates that an event, process, or competition includes a replay phase or stage in its structure.
  • C. hasReplayWindow
    Indicates that an entity has a defined time period during which a past event, action, or content can be replayed or re-accessed.
  • D. isReplay
    Indicates that an event, action, or content instance is a repeated playback or reproduction of a previously occurring original.
  • E. hasReplayabilityFocus chosen
    Indicates that something is designed or evaluated with an emphasis on being enjoyable or worthwhile to experience multiple times.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e8b28848190abd81fe7a7374910 completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8e2c648190a65fc9c7872861af completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a10036481909c71188b2a0e7f04 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:13 p.m.