Triple
T36657069
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 614 |
E905021
|
entity |
| Predicate | governsSyntaxElement |
P197373
|
FINISHED |
| Object | decorator |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: decorator | Statement: [PEP 614, governsSyntaxElement, decorator]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: governsSyntaxElement Context triple: [PEP 614, governsSyntaxElement, decorator]
-
A.
definesSyntaxElement
chosen
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes the syntactic form or structure of another entity.
-
B.
explainsSyntaxElement
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation or clarification of the syntax or structural role of another element.
-
C.
governsCodeElements
Indicates that one code element controls, constrains, or determines the behavior or structure of other code elements.
-
D.
syntaxElement
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a syntactic unit or component within a larger grammatical or structural expression.
-
E.
supportsSyntaxElement
Indicates that one entity provides compatibility or handling capability for a particular syntax element in another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6e3b908190970251b30f76ad71 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a030713bd2881908bcc69e7d1e9fd09 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 10:55 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0304c29abc819085ffd17ab9a8c844 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 10:45 a.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.