Triple
T36657026
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 614 |
E905021
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatesToFeature |
P201453
|
FINISHED |
| Object | decorator syntax |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: decorator syntax | Statement: [PEP 614, relatesToFeature, decorator syntax]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatesToFeature Context triple: [PEP 614, relatesToFeature, decorator syntax]
-
A.
relatedToFeature
chosen
Indicates that there is a general association or connection between an entity and a particular feature.
-
B.
isFeatureOf
Indicates that something functions as a characteristic, attribute, or component belonging to or describing another entity.
-
C.
relatedTo
Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
-
D.
relatesToBranch
Indicates a general association or connection between an entity and a specific branch (such as a subdivision, offshoot, or subunit) within a larger structure or system.
-
E.
appliesToFeature
Indicates that something (such as a rule, constraint, or configuration) is relevant to, or governs, a specific feature.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e6e3b908190970251b30f76ad71 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:49 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8e2c648190a65fc9c7872861af |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0bf4b88190bdcfae9a14b51f0a |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:11 p.m.