Triple

T36484481
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Canadian SMEs E898900 entity
Predicate typicalSizeCategory P62521 FINISHED
Object small enterprise LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: small enterprise | Statement: [Canadian SMEs, typicalSizeCategory, small enterprise]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalSizeCategory
Context triple: [Canadian SMEs, typicalSizeCategory, small enterprise]
  • A. sizeCategory chosen
    Indicates the relative size classification assigned to an entity compared to others (e.g., small, medium, large).
  • B. typicalFit
    Indicates that one entity is a usual, expected, or characteristic match or correspondence for another in a given context.
  • C. typicalCastSize
    Indicates the usual or standard number of cast members involved in a production or performance.
  • D. typicalDimension
    Indicates that one entity represents a standard or characteristic measurement (such as size, length, or capacity) typically associated with another entity.
  • E. sizeStatus
    Indicates the relative size condition or classification of one entity in relation to another or to a defined standard.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e5a0e088190a2b6706aeb41723c completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8e2c648190a65fc9c7872861af completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a0bf4b88190bdcfae9a14b51f0a completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.