Triple
T36393358
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sokołów County |
E896392
|
entity |
| Predicate | numberOfUrbanGminas |
P204854
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1 | Statement: [Sokołów County, numberOfUrbanGminas, 1]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: numberOfUrbanGminas Context triple: [Sokołów County, numberOfUrbanGminas, 1]
-
A.
numberOfGminas
Indicates the total count of gminas (municipal administrative units) associated with a given entity.
-
B.
isUrbanGminaOf
Indicates that one entity is an urban gmina (a municipality with city status) that administratively belongs to or governs the other entity.
-
C.
hasUrbanRuralGminas
Indicates that an administrative unit (such as a county or region) includes one or more gminas that are classified as mixed urban-rural municipalities.
-
D.
hasUrbanGmina
Indicates that an entity is associated with, or contains, an urban gmina (a type of urban municipality or commune).
-
E.
hasNumberOfRuralGminas
Indicates the total count of rural gminas (rural administrative districts) associated with a given territorial unit or entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e52e3108190becf70b090ae7bd6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0a54cc8190868c1bfa1590d1a6 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c82f8c88190bd77a086023ac0e1 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:10 p.m.