Triple

T36340764
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject French World War memorials E894914 entity
Predicate typicalLanguageOfInscriptions P15804 FINISHED
Object French LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French | Statement: [French World War memorials, typicalLanguageOfInscriptions, French]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalLanguageOfInscriptions
Context triple: [French World War memorials, typicalLanguageOfInscriptions, French]
  • A. officialLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates the language officially used in the inscriptions associated with a particular entity.
  • B. secondaryLanguageOfInscriptions
    Indicates that a specified language serves as the secondary language used in the inscriptions associated with a given entity.
  • C. inscriptionsLanguage chosen
    Indicates that the language used in the inscriptions on an object or surface is the specified language.
  • D. typicalLanguageOfReadings
    Indicates the language that is most commonly used for readings or interpretations associated with a given entity.
  • E. languageAttestedIn
    Indicates that evidence exists showing the use or presence of a particular language in a specified place, time, or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4e90148190b02fe52593c70b5b completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8d06cc8190ab6a5e18d9d2571e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a0a54cc8190868c1bfa1590d1a6 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.