Triple
T36298783
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Crow King |
E893444
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithTreatyContext |
P5763
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Fort Laramie Treaty era |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fort Laramie Treaty era | Statement: [Crow King, associatedWithTreatyContext, Fort Laramie Treaty era]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithTreatyContext Context triple: [Crow King, associatedWithTreatyContext, Fort Laramie Treaty era]
-
A.
linkedToTreaty
Indicates that an entity has a formal connection or association with a specific treaty, such as being established by, governed by, or otherwise related to that treaty.
-
B.
relatedToTreaty
chosen
Indicates that there exists a connection, association, or relevance between an entity and a specific treaty or treaties.
-
C.
linkedTreaty
Indicates that there is a formal treaty connection or association between the related entities, such as being parties to, or otherwise bound by, the same treaty.
-
D.
treatyMention
Indicates that a treaty is referenced or mentioned in relation to the associated entities or context.
-
E.
followedTreaty
Indicates that one party complied with and acted in accordance with the terms of a specified treaty in relation to another party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e4a61f0819084a2b68dbbb4efc6 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8d06cc8190ab6a5e18d9d2571e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0a54cc8190868c1bfa1590d1a6 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.