Triple

T36282428
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Operation Varsity E892973 entity
Predicate riverCrossingSupported P33399 FINISHED
Object Rhine River E13461 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rhine River | Statement: [Operation Varsity, riverCrossingSupported, Rhine River]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: riverCrossingSupported
Context triple: [Operation Varsity, riverCrossingSupported, Rhine River]
  • A. hasRiverCrossingType
    Indicates the type or nature of a river crossing associated with an entity (e.g., bridge, ford, ferry).
  • B. riverCrossingFunction
    Indicates a functional relationship where something or someone is transported or moved from one side of a river to the other.
  • C. riverCrossingConnection chosen
    Indicates a connection between two locations that are linked by a route or structure specifically used to cross a river.
  • D. hasRiverCrossingNearby
    Indicates that there is a river crossing located in close proximity to the referenced entity or location.
  • E. hasCanalCrossing
    Indicates that one entity is connected to or traversed by another via a canal crossing, such as a bridge, aqueduct, or similar structure over a canal.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e4955c08190b8cfddca34fc0242 completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7c29e1b848190b945c6c6120a5330 completed May 3, 2026, 9:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a39dbb359fc8190a88dbd1cf0cc0bd7 completed June 23, 2026, 1:04 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7c1b6e7a881908deb96bedb2713f4 completed May 3, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:09 p.m.