Triple

T36135234
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Life’s Lottery E1045146 entity
Predicate hasEndingCountApproximate P195111 FINISHED
Object dozens of distinct endings LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: dozens of distinct endings | Statement: [Life’s Lottery, hasEndingCountApproximate, dozens of distinct endings]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEndingCountApproximate
Context triple: [Life’s Lottery, hasEndingCountApproximate, dozens of distinct endings]
  • A. hasApproximateEnd
    Indicates that an entity’s end point, time, or boundary is known only approximately rather than precisely.
  • B. hasEnding
    Indicates that one entity concludes with, or terminates in, another entity (such as a specific substring, segment, or final component).
  • C. hasApproximateEndAge
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an estimated or imprecise age at which it ends, ceases, or is no longer applicable.
  • D. hasApproximateStepCount
    Indicates that an entity is associated with an estimated or non-exact number of steps.
  • E. hasEnd
    Indicates that one entity serves as the terminal point, boundary, or conclusion of another entity or process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e36a4508190b5bfc8f594272a4c completed May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fda5003cdc8190a558501271389912 completed May 8, 2026, 8:55 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fda05bfc2c819096821a5300e9bb24 completed May 8, 2026, 8:35 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fda4fe67a08190bdaa84ceabd6de6c completed May 8, 2026, 8:55 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.