Triple
T36117105
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bohr’s 1928 paper “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory” |
E1044640
|
entity |
| Predicate | proposesInterpretationOf |
P33381
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quantum mechanics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: quantum mechanics | Statement: [Bohr’s 1928 paper “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”, proposesInterpretationOf, quantum mechanics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: proposesInterpretationOf Context triple: [Bohr’s 1928 paper “The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory”, proposesInterpretationOf, quantum mechanics]
-
A.
intendedInterpretation
Indicates that one entity is meant to be understood or interpreted in a particular way, sense, or meaning relative to another.
-
B.
containsInterpretationOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity includes or embodies an interpretation or understanding of another entity.
-
C.
hasNotableInterpretationIn
Indicates that something (such as a work, concept, or symbol) has a significant or widely recognized interpretation within a specified context, field, or tradition.
-
D.
disputedInterpretation
Indicates that there is disagreement or contention over how something should be understood, interpreted, or explained.
-
E.
interpretiveConsequence
Indicates that one entity is a conclusion, implication, or interpretive outcome that follows from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e344a4c8190af3858c6d78ba88f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:48 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7b3e2f3c08190be4fd1ae4fa1266d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:45 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7b1bcc47081909fe7d592ac69006c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8:36 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:08 p.m.