Triple
T36000908
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sarekjiegná |
E1041126
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedProtectedAreaNetwork |
P81061
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Laponia World Heritage area |
E1014655
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Laponia World Heritage area | Statement: [Sarekjiegná, relatedProtectedAreaNetwork, Laponia World Heritage area]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedProtectedAreaNetwork Context triple: [Sarekjiegná, relatedProtectedAreaNetwork, Laponia World Heritage area]
-
A.
partOfProtectedAreaNetwork
Indicates that an area is included within and contributes to a designated network of protected areas.
-
B.
modernProtectedArea
Indicates that an area is designated and managed as a contemporary legally recognized protected area under modern conservation frameworks.
-
C.
relatedProtectedAreaType
chosen
Indicates that one protected area is associated with another through a specific type of protected-area relationship or classification.
-
D.
countryProtectedAreaFramework
Indicates that a country has an established legal or policy framework governing the designation, management, and protection of its protected areas.
-
E.
countryProtectedAreaSystem
Indicates that a country has an established system or network of designated protected areas under its jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e2a02208190aedd1f9025a8b300 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8d06cc8190ab6a5e18d9d2571e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a390d329f4c8190a2ecbd89db95ef5b |
completed | June 22, 2026, 10:23 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0895b48190acdd88dc10db7be7 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:07 p.m.