Triple

T35826028
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sans Famille E1035643 entity
Predicate notableAdaptationLanguage P206069 FINISHED
Object Japanese LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Japanese | Statement: [Sans Famille, notableAdaptationLanguage, Japanese]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableAdaptationLanguage
Context triple: [Sans Famille, notableAdaptationLanguage, Japanese]
  • A. notableAdaptation
    Indicates that one work is a significant adaptation or reinterpretation of another work.
  • B. notableAdaptationElement
    Indicates that one work is a significant adaptation or reinterpretation of another work.
  • C. notableAdaptationType
    Indicates that one work is a significant adaptation of another work in a specific way or medium (e.g., film adaptation, stage adaptation).
  • D. notableAdaptationStudio
    Indicates that a particular studio is especially recognized for creating an adaptation of the subject work or property.
  • E. notableForAdaptationsOf
    Indicates that one entity is recognized or distinguished for creating, producing, or being associated with adaptations of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e185ffc8190880b3cdf51decd38 completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037ce70f54819082946dad8d380825 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a069e6c8190857b611fffb7b867 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037ce53de881908cf14141cf3bc570 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.