Triple

T35776214
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Layover E1034297 entity
Predicate hasPrimaryVocalTexture P206045 FINISHED
Object group harmonies LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: group harmonies | Statement: [Layover, hasPrimaryVocalTexture, group harmonies]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryVocalTexture
Context triple: [Layover, hasPrimaryVocalTexture, group harmonies]
  • A. hasNotableVocalType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific, noteworthy type or quality of vocalization or voice.
  • B. hasMusicalVocalType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific type or classification of singing voice.
  • C. hasSecondaryVocalStyle
    Indicates that an entity (typically a performer or recording) employs an additional, non-primary vocal style alongside its main vocal style.
  • D. hasVocals
    Indicates that the subject includes or features vocal elements, such as singing or spoken voice, rather than being purely instrumental or non-vocal.
  • E. hasMainVocals
    Indicates that the specified entity performs the primary or lead vocal part in a musical work or performance.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76e14a1e081908eddd57bd6fdb3be completed May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037ce70f54819082946dad8d380825 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a069e6c8190857b611fffb7b867 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037ce53de881908cf14141cf3bc570 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:06 p.m.