Triple
T35609766
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Hampshire–Maine water resource management agreements |
E1029002
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | water resource management agreement |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: water resource management agreement Context triple: [New Hampshire–Maine water resource management agreements, instanceOf, water resource management agreement]
-
A.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
B.
water management project
A water management project is an organized initiative that plans, develops, and operates systems and practices to sustainably collect, store, distribute, and protect water resources for human and environmental needs.
-
C.
water management agency
A water management agency is an organization responsible for planning, regulating, and overseeing the sustainable allocation, use, and protection of water resources within a defined region.
-
D.
water management structure
A water management structure is a constructed facility or system designed to control, store, convey, or regulate the quantity and movement of water in natural or built environments.
-
E.
water resources programme
A water resources programme is an organized set of policies, projects, and management activities aimed at sustainably developing, allocating, protecting, and monitoring water resources to meet environmental, social, and economic needs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76e0653ec81909b1b813c126c6574 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:05 p.m.