Triple
T35538289
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NIMONIC |
E1026991
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalAlloyingElement |
P108185
|
FINISHED |
| Object | chromium |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chromium | Statement: [NIMONIC, typicalAlloyingElement, chromium]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalAlloyingElement Context triple: [NIMONIC, typicalAlloyingElement, chromium]
-
A.
commonAlloyName
Indicates that one entity is the commonly used or recognized alloy name corresponding to another entity representing that alloy.
-
B.
formsAlloysWith
chosen
Indicates that two substances can combine to form a homogeneous metallic alloy with each other.
-
C.
typicalValueForMetals
Indicates the characteristic or commonly observed value of a given property specifically for metals.
-
D.
typicalValueForAluminum
Indicates the standard or commonly accepted value (such as a property or parameter) that is characteristic for aluminum in a given context.
-
E.
associatedMetal
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or connected to a particular metal, such as by composition, usage, origin, or symbolic association.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dff7e508190b28ceeee770dce23 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8d06cc8190ab6a5e18d9d2571e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a04d8348190a4819666eab42c9b |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:04 p.m.