Triple
T35426725
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Milner-Barry Gambit in the French Defence |
E1023939
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalTacticalMotif |
P1716
|
FINISHED |
| Object | sacrifices on e6 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sacrifices on e6 | Statement: [Milner-Barry Gambit in the French Defence, typicalTacticalMotif, sacrifices on e6]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalTacticalMotif Context triple: [Milner-Barry Gambit in the French Defence, typicalTacticalMotif, sacrifices on e6]
-
A.
tacticOf
Indicates that one entity is a tactic, method, or strategy employed or used by another entity.
-
B.
hasCommonTacticOfOpponents
Indicates that two or more entities share the same tactic or strategy used by their respective opponents.
-
C.
tacticInspiredBy
Indicates that a tactic is derived from, influenced by, or modeled after another tactic or source.
-
D.
typicalOpeningPattern
Indicates that there is a commonly occurring or characteristic initial configuration, sequence, or arrangement associated with the given context.
-
E.
tactic
chosen
Indicates a strategic method or maneuver employed by one entity to influence, counter, or gain advantage over another in a specific context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76df6704081909900c60be10d5849 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:47 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8d06cc8190ab6a5e18d9d2571e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a037a0324d08190ac5b610cc0f6a38c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:03 p.m.