Triple

T35181497
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject J. Pierrepont Finch E1015862 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWith Rosemary Pilkington P206861 FINISHED
Object love interest LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: love interest | Statement: [J. Pierrepont Finch, relationshipTypeWith Rosemary Pilkington, love interest]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Rosemary Pilkington
Context triple: [J. Pierrepont Finch, relationshipTypeWith Rosemary Pilkington, love interest]
  • A. relationshipToRose Castorini
    Indicates the specific familial, romantic, or social relationship that one entity has to Rose Castorini.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithHesterCollyer
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Hester Collyer.
  • C. relationshipTypeWithLily Owens
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relational connection that an entity has with Lily Owens.
  • D. relationshipTypeWith Alicia Johns
    Indicates the specific type or nature of the relationship that an entity has with Alicia Johns.
  • E. relationshipTypeWithMarnie
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Marnie.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76ddcc108819097f96853b7ed9ef4 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a037a016960819093ed4990fb4d9d36 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c82179081908325a59b8539b3a8 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.