Triple
T35143031
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Article 15(5) |
E1014746
|
entity |
| Predicate | upheldIn |
P1123
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is a landmark 2008 Supreme Court of India judgment that largely upheld the constitutional validity of reservations for Other Backward Classes in educational institutions while laying down important limitations and guidelines on their implementation.
|
E2130297
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India | Statement: [Article 15(5), upheldIn, Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India Triple: [Article 15(5), upheldIn, Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India]
Generated description
Ashoka Kumar Thakur v. Union of India is a landmark 2008 Supreme Court of India judgment that largely upheld the constitutional validity of reservations for Other Backward Classes in educational institutions while laying down important limitations and guidelines on their implementation.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dda7c108190a2ffd93eb6c341a7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78cab90cc8190827145ac515d203b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:58 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a3803f8a4808190972ddea2bea0b077 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a3804532178819096d202071804d5d4 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 3:33 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a3804b58db481909e2f37efe26a5208 |
completed | June 21, 2026, 3:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:02 p.m.