Triple

T35114441
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject "How do I love thee? Let me count the ways" E1013393 entity
Predicate hasPronounciationRhymeWith P67458 FINISHED
Object "thee" / "me" internal sound pattern LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: "thee" / "me" internal sound pattern | Statement: ["How do I love thee? Let me count the ways", hasPronounciationRhymeWith, "thee" / "me" internal sound pattern]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPronounciationRhymeWith
Context triple: ["How do I love thee? Let me count the ways", hasPronounciationRhymeWith, "thee" / "me" internal sound pattern]
  • A. hasPhonologicalSimilarityTo
    Indicates that two linguistic elements share similar sound patterns or phonological features.
  • B. hasPronunciationDifferenceFrom
    Indicates that two linguistic items differ in how they are pronounced.
  • C. hasRhymingName
    Indicates that one entity has a name that rhymes with the name of another entity.
  • D. hasRhymingText chosen
    Indicates that two pieces of text share a rhyming relationship, typically ending with similar or identical sounds.
  • E. hasHomophones
    Indicates that two or more linguistic expressions share the same pronunciation but differ in meaning, spelling, or both.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dd659d08190bcdc00d37caafb62 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0358c946f08190a8fb41c643074475 completed May 12, 2026, 4:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a03586e5bb08190a71e075fde7cd679 completed May 12, 2026, 4:42 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4:01 p.m.