Triple

T34947326
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tupi language E1007889 entity
Predicate notableLoanwordToPortuguese P206748 FINISHED
Object abacaxi LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: abacaxi | Statement: [Tupi language, notableLoanwordToPortuguese, abacaxi]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableLoanwordToPortuguese
Context triple: [Tupi language, notableLoanwordToPortuguese, abacaxi]
  • A. cognateInPortuguese
    Indicates that a word or term has a cognate (a related form with common etymological origin) in Portuguese.
  • B. hasPortugueseNameMeaning
    Indicates that an entity has a Portuguese name whose semantic meaning is being specified or referenced.
  • C. hasAbbreviationInPortuguese
    Indicates that one entity is used as the Portuguese-language abbreviation or shortened form of another entity.
  • D. nameInPortuguese
    Indicates that an entity is referred to by a specific name when expressed in the Portuguese language.
  • E. IPAInBrazilianPortuguese
    Indicates that something represents or is expressed using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) as used for Brazilian Portuguese pronunciation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc5d4308190b77553ee07b1ede6 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379ff1ba081908eda86acefcf69fb completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c82179081908325a59b8539b3a8 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.