Triple

T34920895
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lawrence Jameson E1007132 entity
Predicate typicalVictim P140041 FINISHED
Object wealthy women vacationing on the French Riviera LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: wealthy women vacationing on the French Riviera | Statement: [Lawrence Jameson, typicalVictim, wealthy women vacationing on the French Riviera]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalVictim
Context triple: [Lawrence Jameson, typicalVictim, wealthy women vacationing on the French Riviera]
  • A. hasTypicalVictimRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity typically occupies the role of a victim in the context of a particular action, event, or relationship.
  • B. coVictim
    Indicates that two or more entities are victims in the same harmful event or incident.
  • C. threatenedVictim
    Indicates that one entity has issued or posed a threat of harm or adverse consequences toward another entity.
  • D. victimGroup
    Indicates that one group or entity is the target or recipient of harm, abuse, or wrongdoing caused by another.
  • E. portraysAsVictim
    Indicates that one entity represents or depicts another entity as a victim in a given context or narrative.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dc2b6b0819095a61debbd405269 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379ff1ba081908eda86acefcf69fb completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.