Triple
T34692812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joan Clayton |
E890944
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipTypeWithMayaWilkes |
P205524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | best friend |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: best friend | Statement: [Joan Clayton, relationshipTypeWithMayaWilkes, best friend]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithMayaWilkes Context triple: [Joan Clayton, relationshipTypeWithMayaWilkes, best friend]
-
A.
relationshipTypeWith Maya Gallo
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Maya Gallo.
-
B.
relationshipTypeWithMarnie
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Marnie.
-
C.
relationshipTypeWith Willis Davidge
Indicates the specific nature or category of the relationship that an entity has with Willis Davidge.
-
D.
relationshipTypeWithNickWells
Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Nick Wells.
-
E.
relationshipToCharmaineHollingsworth
Indicates the specific nature of the relationship an entity has with Charmaine Hollingsworth.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349db7ab8819086808e833f472871 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379fd7aac8190873077e63873aa72 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.