Triple
T34630219
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James Payton |
E889254
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativeRelationType |
P43530
|
FINISHED |
| Object | brother-in-law of Ben Barber |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: brother-in-law of Ben Barber | Statement: [James Payton, relativeRelationType, brother-in-law of Ben Barber]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeRelationType Context triple: [James Payton, relativeRelationType, brother-in-law of Ben Barber]
-
A.
allyRelation
Indicates a cooperative, supportive relationship in which the entities act as allies toward shared or aligned goals.
-
B.
relatedType
chosen
Indicates that one entity is connected to another through a specified type or category of relationship.
-
C.
relationshipType
Indicates the specific kind of relationship that exists between two or more entities.
-
D.
subjectRelation
Indicates that one entity stands in a specified relational role or connection to another entity.
-
E.
laterRelationWith
Indicates that one entity stands in a temporal relationship to another such that it occurs or exists at a later time than the other.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d64a388190a013cfa9bd33fad7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8c34f88190ace26f555827f23e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379fd7aac8190873077e63873aa72 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.