Triple
T34321612
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Koewacht |
E880748
|
entity |
| Predicate | locatedInAdminArea |
P71092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Terneuzen |
E252140
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Terneuzen | Statement: [Koewacht, locatedInAdminArea, Terneuzen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: locatedInAdminArea Context triple: [Koewacht, locatedInAdminArea, Terneuzen]
-
A.
isLocatedInAdministrativeArea
chosen
Indicates that one entity is situated within the geographic or jurisdictional boundaries of a specified administrative area (such as a city, county, state, or region).
-
B.
locatedIn
Indicates that one entity exists or is situated within the spatial, administrative, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
-
C.
partlyInAdministrativeArea
Indicates that an entity is located such that only a portion of it lies within a specified administrative area (e.g., a city, county, or region).
-
D.
hasAdministrativeArea
Indicates that one entity serves as the governing or jurisdictional area responsible for administering another entity.
-
E.
administersAreaType
Indicates that a governing body or authority is responsible for managing or overseeing a specific type or category of geographic or administrative area.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349b9cd508190a996a616903b3e6d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8ae0248190b7e2ce4bf852c22d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a45de0026148190bed57ae1a6231ce6 |
completed | July 2, 2026, 3:41 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379fbe4a08190bfe65ebd141164e9 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.