Triple

T34289714
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lauren Wando E879849 entity
Predicate associatedWithDisasterType P205390 FINISHED
Object volcanic disaster LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: volcanic disaster | Statement: [Lauren Wando, associatedWithDisasterType, volcanic disaster]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithDisasterType
Context triple: [Lauren Wando, associatedWithDisasterType, volcanic disaster]
  • A. typeOfDisaster
    Indicates that one entity is classified as a specific kind or category of disaster in relation to another entity.
  • B. supportsDisasterType
    Indicates that one entity is capable of handling, responding to, or being applicable to a specified type of disaster.
  • C. disasterDepicted
    Indicates that one entity visually represents or portrays a disaster involving or affecting another entity.
  • D. notableDisasterType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of disaster for which something (such as a place, event, or entity) is notable or best known.
  • E. hasDisaster
    Indicates that an entity experiences, is affected by, or is associated with a disaster event.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349b6df1c81908e5e5b6c2ab6409b completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379fbe4a08190bfe65ebd141164e9 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:57 a.m.