Triple

T34120859
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jacqueline Broyer E875125 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWith Marcus Graham P205325 FINISHED
Object romantic interest LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic interest | Statement: [Jacqueline Broyer, relationshipTypeWith Marcus Graham, romantic interest]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWith Marcus Graham
Context triple: [Jacqueline Broyer, relationshipTypeWith Marcus Graham, romantic interest]
  • A. relationshipTypeWithMarcus Brewer
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Marcus Brewer.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithFredGraham
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Fred Graham.
  • C. relationshipTypeWithGraceHanson
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship an entity has with Grace Hanson.
  • D. relationshipTypeWith Helen Graham
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Helen Graham.
  • E. relationshipTypeWithMarkMcPherson
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with Mark McPherson.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349a9271c81909576994c9ef7b179 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f963908190846d232f386fd98f completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:53 a.m.