Triple

T34027869
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Doloritas Preciado E872559 entity
Predicate relationshipWithPedroPáramo P205285 FINISHED
Object romantic relationship LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic relationship | Statement: [Doloritas Preciado, relationshipWithPedroPáramo, romantic relationship]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipWithPedroPáramo
Context triple: [Doloritas Preciado, relationshipWithPedroPáramo, romantic relationship]
  • A. relationshipTypeWith Aureliano Segundo
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relational connection that an entity has with Aureliano Segundo.
  • B. relationshipToJoséArcadioBuendía
    Indicates the specific familial or social relationship that an entity has to José Arcadio Buendía.
  • C. relationshipToCelestina
    Indicates the specific type of personal, social, or familial relationship that one entity has to Celestina.
  • D. relationshipToHéctor
    Indicates a familial, social, or emotional connection that someone has with Héctor.
  • E. relationshipToPármeno
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship that one entity has to Pármeno.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349a2527c81909a7cd4bda94d70ad completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c92f03c8190ae2751270b195423 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f963908190846d232f386fd98f completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:51 a.m.