Triple
T33907453
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Eliza Lucas Pinckney |
E869221
|
entity |
| Predicate | securedSupportFrom |
P190700
|
FINISHED |
| Object | British government for indigo bounties |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: British government for indigo bounties | Statement: [Eliza Lucas Pinckney, securedSupportFrom, British government for indigo bounties]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securedSupportFrom Context triple: [Eliza Lucas Pinckney, securedSupportFrom, British government for indigo bounties]
-
A.
securedStatus
Indicates that an entity’s state, access, or data has been protected or locked down to prevent unauthorized use or modification.
-
B.
securedVia
Indicates that something is protected, authenticated, or made safe through a specified method, mechanism, or channel.
-
C.
securedAgainst
Indicates that one entity is protected or safeguarded against threats, risks, or harmful actions originating from another entity or source.
-
D.
support
Indicates that one entity provides assistance, endorsement, or backing to another entity or its actions.
-
E.
providesSupportTo
Indicates that one entity offers help, resources, or reinforcement to another entity to aid its function, stability, or success.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3499869bc8190b6c33a81686af226 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fcce2cf9188190b3f65b362203a6a3 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcccee6240819084680887731ff64b |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:33 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fccdd2d84481909a7ce22407def9c7 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 5:37 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:48 a.m.