Triple
T33818807
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Stratovarius |
E866767
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableFormerGuitarist |
P102628
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Timo Tolkki |
E2064332
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Timo Tolkki | Statement: [Stratovarius, notableFormerGuitarist, Timo Tolkki]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableFormerGuitarist Context triple: [Stratovarius, notableFormerGuitarist, Timo Tolkki]
-
A.
notableBandMember
Indicates that the subject is a member of the band in the object and is recognized as particularly prominent or significant within that band.
-
B.
previousGuitarist
chosen
Indicates that one entity formerly served as the guitarist for another entity, but no longer holds that role.
-
C.
hasGuitarist
Indicates that an entity has, employs, or is associated with a guitarist as part of it.
-
D.
notableKeyboardist
Indicates that the subject is a keyboard player who is widely recognized or distinguished for their skill, influence, or prominence.
-
E.
notableFormerArtist
Indicates that the subject was previously an artist associated with the object and is recognized as notable in that former artistic role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349911a8c81908478662194b23d8c |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037e0953908190b2930b3c06a40129 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:22 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a36760b03ec8190ab128eade79a1fdb |
completed | June 20, 2026, 11:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f6c3308190b954f7810214ceed |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:46 a.m.