Triple

T33743602
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kentucky telephone numbering plan area E864638 entity
Predicate originalAreaCodeAssignmentYear P204237 FINISHED
Object 1947 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1947 | Statement: [Kentucky telephone numbering plan area, originalAreaCodeAssignmentYear, 1947]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: originalAreaCodeAssignmentYear
Context triple: [Kentucky telephone numbering plan area, originalAreaCodeAssignmentYear, 1947]
  • A. hasAreaCodeSystem
    Indicates that a telephone numbering plan, region, or communication system uses or is associated with a particular area code system.
  • B. hasAreaCode
    Indicates that a specified telephone area code is assigned to or associated with a particular geographic region, location, or phone service entity.
  • C. areaCode
    Indicates that a location, phone number, or region is associated with a specific telephone area code.
  • D. hasAreaCodeType
    Indicates that an entity’s area code is associated with a specific type or classification of area code.
  • E. hasAreaNumber
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific area identified by a numerical code.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498b24b8819096a65009e521d0e1 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0353887e848190ad98ecbbe7bbc061 completed May 12, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0352dfb5648190b9f8c9b7c388d2a1 completed May 12, 2026, 4:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a0353877d4c8190a461118bc66d6b09 completed May 12, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:44 a.m.