Triple
T33697067
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Viken electoral district (after reform planning) |
E863342
|
entity |
| Predicate | includesFormerCounty |
P26580
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Akershus |
E92851
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Akershus | Statement: [Viken electoral district (after reform planning), includesFormerCounty, Akershus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: includesFormerCounty Context triple: [Viken electoral district (after reform planning), includesFormerCounty, Akershus]
-
A.
hasFormerCounty
Indicates that an entity was previously part of, or administered by, a particular county in the past but no longer is.
-
B.
formerAdministrativeCountyIncludes
chosen
Indicates that a geographic area was once part of, or contained within, the boundaries of a former administrative county.
-
C.
includesCounty
Indicates that a larger geographic or administrative region contains or encompasses a specific county within its boundaries.
-
D.
containsFormerMunicipality
Indicates that an administrative unit includes within its boundaries an area that was previously an independent municipality.
-
E.
historicCountyPredecessor
Indicates that one historic county served as a predecessor or earlier form of another historic county in an administrative or territorial succession.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498723a08190ac034339cc78eade |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a034540e37c819087a5c75c559323d8 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 3:20 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a365c6e309881908c2f7ccd4d8ca91f |
completed | June 20, 2026, 9:25 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0344e26fec8190867227f9692e92df |
completed | May 12, 2026, 3:18 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:43 a.m.