Triple

T33637761
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sweetness E861741 entity
Predicate associatedWithPositionGroup P205249 FINISHED
Object offensive backfield LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: offensive backfield | Statement: [Sweetness, associatedWithPositionGroup, offensive backfield]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithPositionGroup
Context triple: [Sweetness, associatedWithPositionGroup, offensive backfield]
  • A. associatedWithPositionHolderName
    Indicates that an entity is linked to the name of the person or role currently holding a specific position.
  • B. associatedWithCharacterGroup
    Indicates that an entity has a connection or affiliation with a particular group of characters.
  • C. associatedWithOwnerGroup
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or belongs to a specific owner group that has responsibility or control over it.
  • D. refersToGroupAssociatedWith
    Indicates that one entity makes reference to a group that is associated or linked with another specified entity.
  • E. associatedWithCityGroup
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a specific group or collection of cities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3498280c48190bcc3494017d14234 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f505c88190ac0879ab422c3054 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:42 a.m.