Triple
T33608857
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Waves (Miguel song) |
E860930
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixEP |
P205238
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rogue Waves |
E358941
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rogue Waves | Statement: [Waves (Miguel song), hasRemixEP, Rogue Waves]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixEP Context triple: [Waves (Miguel song), hasRemixEP, Rogue Waves]
-
A.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
B.
hasRemixed
Indicates that one entity has created a new version or adaptation of another entity by remixing it.
-
C.
containsRemixes
Indicates that one entity includes or is associated with remix versions of another entity.
-
D.
hasRemixGenre
Indicates that a work or track has a remix version characterized by a particular musical genre.
-
E.
hasRemixOrEdit
Indicates that one work is a remix or edited version of another work, or that such a derivative relationship exists between two works.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3498037c88190a4500f002b5540e0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a36119b002481909b674d1d34df4f85 |
completed | June 20, 2026, 4:05 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f505c88190ac0879ab422c3054 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:41 a.m.