Triple
T33575626
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | A minor |
E860021
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalCadenceDominant |
P205224
|
FINISHED |
| Object | E major |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E major | Statement: [A minor, typicalCadenceDominant, E major]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalCadenceDominant Context triple: [A minor, typicalCadenceDominant, E major]
-
A.
dominantTone
Indicates the primary or most prominent emotional or stylistic tone that characterizes something in relation to other possible tones.
-
B.
typicalTempoPattern
Indicates the characteristic or commonly occurring tempo progression or rhythmic pattern associated with an action or event.
-
C.
dominantDuring
Indicates that one entity holds a prevailing or controlling influence over another specifically within a given time period or interval.
-
D.
typicalBeatPattern
Indicates the characteristic or standard rhythmic pattern that usually occurs in a given musical or temporal context.
-
E.
dominantNote
Indicates that one note functions as the dominant (fifth scale degree) in relation to another note, typically resolving to it harmonically.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497d37848190afcbb5ef3f5c7376 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c9141dc819098d7fcc36e69882c |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f505c88190ac0879ab422c3054 |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a037c80ba448190853011097a151b7e |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:40 a.m.