Triple
T33492962
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In the Meantime |
E857787
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasProminentBassRiff |
P99248
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [In the Meantime, hasProminentBassRiff, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProminentBassRiff Context triple: [In the Meantime, hasProminentBassRiff, yes]
-
A.
hasNotableBassline
chosen
Indicates that something (typically a piece of music) features a bassline that is particularly prominent, distinctive, or otherwise noteworthy.
-
B.
hasBasslineCharacteristic
Indicates that something possesses a specific quality, style, or feature related to its bassline.
-
C.
hasNotableGuitarRiffBy
Indicates that something (typically a song or musical piece) is characterized by a notable guitar riff performed or created by a specified guitarist.
-
D.
hasBassIntroBy
Indicates a relationship where a musical piece features an introductory section performed or led by a bass instrument or bass player.
-
E.
hasMainRiff
Indicates that one musical piece, section, or track features another musical phrase or pattern as its primary recurring riff.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3497547608190a1a0f2365fb713ee |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a01a18e350481909f848686568d19bc |
completed | May 11, 2026, 9:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a01a121b67c81908a6c5be9eb8e9ca5 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 9:28 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:38 a.m.