Triple
T33464569
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Virgin Classics |
E857010
|
entity |
| Predicate | rosterIncludes |
P3191
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Emmanuelle Haïm
Emmanuelle Haïm is a French conductor and harpsichordist renowned for her interpretations of Baroque opera and early music.
|
E2052443
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Emmanuelle Haïm | Statement: [Virgin Classics, rosterIncludes, Emmanuelle Haïm]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Emmanuelle Haïm Triple: [Virgin Classics, rosterIncludes, Emmanuelle Haïm]
Generated description
Emmanuelle Haïm is a French conductor and harpsichordist renowned for her interpretations of Baroque opera and early music.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f34973461481909c701c98ebd75623 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6e4d610b881908674c6ec3226ada4 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:01 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a35816d81148190bc7a689b12bafe4f |
completed | June 19, 2026, 5:50 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a358f677ca48190ada1e1aba6dac731 |
completed | June 19, 2026, 6:50 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a358fd0dcf48190a52bcd61b642541a |
completed | June 19, 2026, 6:52 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:37 a.m.