Triple

T33437379
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject GetCapabilities E856266 entity
Predicate supportsDiscoveryOf P98632 FINISHED
Object map layers LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: map layers | Statement: [GetCapabilities, supportsDiscoveryOf, map layers]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsDiscoveryOf
Context triple: [GetCapabilities, supportsDiscoveryOf, map layers]
  • A. supportedDiscoveryOf
    Indicates that one entity aided, enabled, or contributed to another entity’s act of discovering something.
  • B. supportsFinding
    Indicates that one entity provides the capability or functionality needed to perform, enable, or carry out a particular finding operation on another entity or resource.
  • C. hasDiscoveryFeature chosen
    Indicates that an entity includes or supports a capability for discovering, finding, or surfacing other relevant entities, items, or information.
  • D. namedForDiscoveryOf
    Indicates that one entity is named in recognition of another entity’s discovery of something.
  • E. sharedDiscoveryWith
    Indicates that two or more entities jointly participated in, contributed to, or are mutually associated with the same discovery.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349709e7881908c342b4d34f555f4 completed April 30, 2026, 12:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037c8ae0248190b7e2ce4bf852c22d completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f505c88190ac0879ab422c3054 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:36 a.m.