Triple
T33273911
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony |
E851852
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainProsecutorDescribed |
P1694
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jeff Ashton |
E2043238
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jeff Ashton | Statement: [Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony, mainProsecutorDescribed, Jeff Ashton]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mainProsecutorDescribed Context triple: [Imperfect Justice: Prosecuting Casey Anthony, mainProsecutorDescribed, Jeff Ashton]
-
A.
mainPersecutor
Indicates that one entity is the primary agent responsible for persecuting or oppressing another entity.
-
B.
prosecutorSought
Indicates that a prosecutor actively pursued or requested a particular legal action, charge, or outcome against a party.
-
C.
notableProsecutor
chosen
Indicates that the person served as a prosecutor in a way that is widely recognized as significant or noteworthy.
-
D.
subjectOfProsecution
Indicates that an entity is the target or focus of a legal prosecution or criminal proceeding initiated by an authority.
-
E.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349653da08190819876015a298fdb |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7516d5b4081908588a6feb541f355 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:45 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a35431605108190888a582511ad752f |
completed | June 19, 2026, 1:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f74d40ebb081909daf60623e38f41d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 1:27 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.