Triple
T33265743
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | S.S. Boz-Kourt |
E851639
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCaseName |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | The Case of the S.S. Lotus |
E240555
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Case of the S.S. Lotus | Statement: [S.S. Boz-Kourt, relatedCaseName, The Case of the S.S. Lotus]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedCaseName Context triple: [S.S. Boz-Kourt, relatedCaseName, The Case of the S.S. Lotus]
-
A.
relatedCase
chosen
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
B.
relatedCaseType
Indicates that one case is associated with another case through a specified type of relationship (e.g., precedent, reference, or dependency).
-
C.
associatedCourtCase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
D.
relatedCaseArea
Indicates that one case is associated with, pertains to, or falls within the subject matter or domain of another case area.
-
E.
caseHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates a relationship where one entity’s holding, ownership, or control is legally or logically associated with a particular case or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349642dac81908a37ffcc3b976a55 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a037c8ae0248190b7e2ce4bf852c22d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a35391c568081908e1821cea63d906f |
completed | June 19, 2026, 12:42 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0379f338b881908e5593e45d764f4d |
completed | May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:32 a.m.