Triple

T32972391
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Swingville E843558 entity
Predicate relationshipToPrestige P205218 FINISHED
Object subsidiary imprint LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: subsidiary imprint | Statement: [Swingville, relationshipToPrestige, subsidiary imprint]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToPrestige
Context triple: [Swingville, relationshipToPrestige, subsidiary imprint]
  • A. perceivedPrestigeLevel
    Indicates the degree to which something is regarded as prestigious or high-status in the eyes of observers.
  • B. isPrestigiousIn
    Indicates that an entity is widely recognized and highly regarded for excellence or status within a particular field, domain, or context.
  • C. relationshipReputation
    Indicates how one entity’s standing, trustworthiness, or esteem is perceived by another entity or within a given context.
  • D. morePrestigiousThan
    Indicates that one entity is regarded as having higher status, esteem, or prestige than another.
  • E. hasReputationAmong
    Indicates that an entity is regarded or perceived in a particular way by a specified group or audience.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f3494b9fc48190bb61c955ba471275 completed April 30, 2026, 12:21 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a037cad051c8190b28b354b89208574 completed May 12, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0379f0cbe481909b4b8fc6cbe297f0 completed May 12, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a037cab06288190b093935f235ddff2 completed May 12, 2026, 7:16 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:21 a.m.